Fetal gene screening comes to market


Non-invasive treatment might make prenatal screening simpler, however it features ethical issues.

Till recently, inspecting a fetus’s DNA for signs of hereditary problems implied taking advantage of the mom’s womb with a needle. Now there’s a test that can do it utilizing a little sample of the mom’s blood. MaterniT21, a Down’s syndrome test that Sequenom of San Diego, California, released in significant centres throughout the United States on 17 October, is the very first of numerous such tests anticipated on the marketplace in the next year. It signifies the arrival of a long-anticipated age of non-invasive prenatal hereditary screening, with its attendant advantages and ethical issues (see Nature 469, 289–291; 2011).

” In the future you’ll have the ability to draw out a huge quantity of info from that sequencing information.”

With the technology in location to series the fetal DNA brought in a pregnant female’s blood stream, geneticists anticipate the list of conditions that can be found by non-invasive methods will proliferate. Another business, Gene Security Network of Redwood City, California, states its upcoming test will likewise look for other hereditary problems, and Sequenom is studying the expediency of broadening its test.

” There’s every need to believe that in the future you’ll have the ability to draw out a huge quantity of info from that sequencing information,” states Peter Benn, director of the Diagnostic Human Being Genes Laboratories at the University of Connecticut University Hospital in Farmington.

Sequenom’s test series 36- base-pair pieces of DNA to recognize areas from chromosome21 Generally, the chromosome contributes 1.35% of the overall maternal and fetal DNA in the mom’s blood. An excess of this product suggests the hereditary problem that discounts’s syndrome.

Sequenom is marketing its test as an add-on to present screening approaches, which approximate the possibility that a lady is bring a fetus with Down’s syndrome from ultrasound outcomes and protein markers in the blood. Such non-genetic screening can find 90–95% of Down’s syndrome cases, however incorrectly suggests that approximately 5% of females are bring an infant impacted by the condition. Sequenom’s test might be taken after a favorable screening lead to assist a lady choose whether to go through amniocentesis, a test that draws out amniotic fluid with a needle and brings a little threat of miscarriage. A research study released this month, and spent for by Sequenom, discovered that the business’s test has an incorrect favorable rate of 0.2% (G. E. Palomaki et al. Genet. Med. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182368a0e; 2011).

It might spare some females from having amniocentesis after a false-positive screening outcome. However Benn states that the test will likewise posture troubles. For example, due to the fact that it would take 8–10 days to obtain the outcomes of Sequenom’s test, if a lady did still select amniocentesis, and the outcome verifies that the child has Down’s syndrome, there would be little time delegated choose whether to end the pregnancy. And some females who check favorable on MaterniT21 will most likely opt to end pregnancies right away instead of have amniocentesis.

” Placing this brand-new test in the manner in which Sequenom is proposing is extremely tough, from the client viewpoint, and tough for doctors and counsellors to handle,” Benn states.

Ethicists likewise warn that utilizing such simple screening approaches ever previously in pregnancy may aggravate the gender imbalance seen in nations such as China and India. And if it ends up being regular to look for several type of hereditary problems, ethicists anticipate that more couples might deal with the predicament of whether to bring an ‘unhealthy’ fetus to term.

AD

Advertisement

” The concept that couples have options about whether to continue their pregnancies might end up being stretched due to the fact that moms and dads might be viewed as reckless for enabling ‘faulty’ pregnancies to go to term,” states Mildred Cho, an ethicist at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California. Other ethicists stress that worries of eugenics will be raised if screening can be provided for less-serious conditions.

Sequenom is exclusively concentrated on establishing tests for conditions that are currently part of prenatal screening programs, states Mathias Ehrich, the business’s senior director for research study and advancement diagnostics. “We do not wish to create brand-new applications. Our focus is on making existing medical applications much safer,” he states. “I do not believe that we remain in a position to state that we must identify exactly what hair colour the child has.”

Recommended For You

About the Author: livescience

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *