With the heat of wildfire season simply around the corner for lots of parts of the American West, you may be considering fire-proofing your home. Our recommendations: Stay clear of the SPF 3000 Clear Spray treatment.
On Monday, the district lawyer of Santa Barbara and city lawyer of Los Angeles took legal action against Sun FireDefense, the business behind the fire-proofing spray, on behalf of individuals of California for lying about the capabilities and security of its item.
The item page consists of a video of a “burn test” pitting a wood shingle treated with SPF 3000 versus a neglected one on a grill. 5 minutes in, the without treatment wood has actually burned down to charcoal; the dealt with shingle has actually just been a little blackened.
However the item might not carry out rather so well out in the real life (or in a fire hotter than a grill). As Mike Feuer, city lawyer of L.A., informed CBS Los Angeles, “Our expert tested both treated and untreated wood, and in the course of that test found that the untreated wood and the treated wood performed about the same.”
In the lawsuit, the complainants state the business cannot supply proof that its item has actually gone through any “appropriate, recognized exterior weathering test” to support claims that SPF 3000 “provides protection against heat and embers up to 3000 degrees Fahrenheit” and “is effective for 5+ years after a single application.” Simply put, the lab-controlled environments the spray was evaluated in don’t suffice.
Jim Moseley, Sun FireDefense’s CEO, absolutely rejected the lawsuit’s claims. “It’s complete B.S. … a witch hunt,” he informed the L.A. Times. “They were sent different samples they could pick and choose from. They’ve got everything.”
Sun FireDefense’s site has plenty of reviews from Californians who paid the business $3.50 per square foot to treat their home with SPF 3000. It’s not surprising that the item is so attractive, particularly in a state where huge fires triggered almost 100 deaths and damaged over 23,000 structures in 2015, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Security. A report from previously this summertime discovered that increasing temperature levels were the main consider the five-fold boost California has actually seen in wildfires given that 1970.
Sun FireDefense’s doubtful claims don’t stop at the item’s efficiency: Its site likewise states that SPF 3000 was “Developed using NASA’s technology to protect the Space Shuttle against extreme heat during re-entry into Earth’s atmosphere,” and has actually been “incorporated into fire shelters for firefighters and Forest Service.”
In their lawsuit, the lawyers contest that NASA or the U.S. Forest Service back or were associated with establishing SPF 3000. (The Forest Service does utilize some chemical fire retardants to slow and consist of wildfires, however.)
To top everything off, Feuer informed CBS that the item, which the business claims is safe, “contains two chemicals that California law presumes to be hazardous, because they’re toxic.”
Sun FireDefense is simply among lots of companies watching out for methods to make a profit from all the brand-new issues environment modification is assisting to develop. Thankfully, there are methods to secure your home from wildfires that don’t need spending for suspicious treatments: Ideas from specialists surveyed by the Sierra Club consist of utilizing non-flammable products for your roofing and clearing the location around your home of particles.
Dig Our Work?
As a not-for-profit news outlet, we count on reader assistance to assist money our acclaimed journalism. We’re one of the couple of news outlets committed solely to people-focused ecological protection, and our company believe our material needs to stay totally free and available to all. If you dig our objective and concur news needs to never ever sit behind a paywall, contribute today to assist support our work. Chip in what you can.